It's great to see so much interest in this. This should prove beyond a doubt that there's a market for this product.
I agree :clap: Thanks to the original poster
It's great to see so much interest in this. This should prove beyond a doubt that there's a market for this product.
It is great news to learn that reclock may be back! Hopefully you can implement compatibility with the latest video renderers such Haali Video Renderer or EVR. I would be certainly ready to pay for it, but please just keep the reclock concept as it was: a single direct show filter, no need to create some bundle with some other software. Thanks.
That's about the only group of people that would need it. So like I said, most people wouldn't need it.
Let's rephrase it: Would you pay for a commercial "ReClock" which works better than the free ReClock on XP?
Hi guys !
I agree, although the idea of using a virtual soundcard instead of a DS renderer doesnt sound very bad either and may be much more compatible with some apps and future OSes.
Alex
Hi Sanderh, I think that all technical question are to be ask after the first beta of new reclock are out, don't you think?When playing a PAL movie (or NTSC, doens t matter) you see in the ReClock properties at Media Speed (have it on Auto):
CINEMA adaption: media speed changed to 24 fps. Why is this? I mean, I have made a custom resolution with Powerstrip, in my case 48,065Hz, to achieve actual refresh rate of 47,950 shown in the Video Hardware under the Reclock Properties. This way I have a deviation of 0,002Hz which is in theory allmost perfect. However, if ReClock, like mentioned before, does a so-called CINEMA adaption and changes the media speed to 24fps sharp, isn t it than so that I should make a custom resolution with Powerstrip to achieve a refesh rate of EXACTLY (or very near by) 48,000Hz shown in the Video Hardware of the ReClock properties while playing a movie?
Hi Sanderh, I think that all technical question are to be ask after the first beta of new reclock are out, don't you think?
Howevere I try to discuss with you of the point 5.
You write about 24 fps. Intend for HD material, like hddvd, bluray or WMV? This because PAL standard video is on 25 fps and NTSC is on 30. Can you explain?