gotta agree with vonb. it said 'providers' not 'provider'. tiny, but significant difference. also, i think a la carte option would be better. always is. whats with this weird reasoning 'well, it would be too difficult for the customers'? wait, what?? how difficult can it be, lol? go to your license page, select provider(s), select options (one month, 6 months, a year, lifetime, whatever), click checkout, enter payment info, open AS et voila. if so-called 'pro' had hbomax, paramount+, crackle, xfinity, spectrum, epix, discovery+, showtime, cinemax (all standalones, not via prime channels), and each cost 3-5$ a month, believe you me redfox could squeeze much more than 50$ from a cheap old fart like me. one month per provider, then come back when they add more content. a la carte is a missed opportunity imo. also, there couldve been a lifetime sub option for any of the providers offered via a la carte. one month 5$, lifetime 15$. for instance. these are my 2 cents. anyways, well see what comes of 'pro' when its released. dunno, maybe 50$ wont be as high as it seems right now, at least to me. maybe there will be 20 new providers available from the get-go. if that turns out to be the case, which i doubt, but lets say maybe it will... well... anywho, cheers!
), etc..
