You can't argue with results but let's wait until the smoke clears on this.
Others were also in the boat on this one, including Forum members for other products, but there are always surprises in this business after all.
After all, protections / bad sectors appearing differently in user logs means something that is ordinarily linear is not and this is most unusual.
I've seen status data for successful reads w/ 2 bad sectors, the general "bad" figure is 17 and some showed up to 44.
I'd like to know what version of the disc all the impacted people have.
Amazon US is selling this movie in 3 flavours:
Thor DVD,
Thor (Two-Disc Blu-ray/DVD Combo + Digital Copy), and
Thor (Three-Disc Combo: Blu-ray 3D / Blu-ray / DVD / Digital Copy). Now, in the Blu-Ray releases it's all but guaranteed that if the
Digital Copy is physically on the disc then it will be on the SD DVD disc which means that that DVD will likely be exactly the same for the two different Blu-Ray releases but differ from the SD DVD release because that doesn't come with a
Digital Copy. In the event the
Digital Copy is not actually on a disc in the Blu-Ray sets then it would be possible to use the same SD DVD disc in all the movie release flavours. Personally, I expect there to be a difference between the SD DVD disc sold separately and in the Blu-Ray releases. That being said, I do not expect them to wind up being the same exact size. It'd be a first if it did. So, now I am left with wondering if there will be a
rental-only version of this on SD DVD and if there is then the protection could be different but I would expect the disc sizes to not be the same. This again leads back to the big question of how do the discs differ and why. Maybe the studio is playing a game with multiple releases using different protections in the same release region but that would be a new one that I haven't seen.
So, exactly what disc do people have and people should include the UPC and, if possible, the ASIN? The more information given the more can be figured out.
Users with "0" for their DVD drive region scored highest for bad sectors and that is very weird in my opinion.
The failure to brute force the
CSS keys can result in read errors. Those read errors can then be wrongly interpreted as structural protection.