For the record I wasn't singling anyone out. My comment about being respectful even in disagreement applies to everyone.
Fair enough :rock:
For the record I wasn't singling anyone out. My comment about being respectful even in disagreement applies to everyone.
I'm not gonna pull the trigger on a pre-owned one until I know absolutely for certain a firmware update doesn't enable cinavia. Kind of a hard question to ask LOL.
I was concerned about buying a used one for fear that a possible/probable firmware upgrade could leave me back at square 1. That's why I was thinking seriously about the brand new one in the box versus a used one. I've seen the BDT110 listed for $50 but didn't run across any pre-owned 210's, just new ones as mentioned at $200. Seems the 210 has features the 110 doesn't and didn't see any 310's. Maybe didn't dig deep enough.
Odd that the 210 sells for around $200 and the latest model in that series goes for $98 Can't say I've seen that before...could it be somebody knows something? Nah couldn't be that :disagree:
Thanks go out to you or whoever mentioned using paypal too, could make a big difference. I'm not gonna pull the trigger on a pre-owned one until I know absolutely for certain a firmware update doesn't enable cinavia. Kind of a hard question to ask LOL. Much obliged for your time and info. :clap:
gmac1701
They were never upgraded to support cinavia. Same with the 210,
Gentlemen,
Well I opted for a new Panasonic BDT210 still in the box, manufactured in 2011. I'm concerned about buying pre-owned electronics, especially that old. Having raised 4 kids of my own and now grand-kids, I've seen them abuse just about anything they can get their hands on.
Even if not abused it could have been overused. Not knowing the seller, there's know way of telling how much life is left in it. Decided to be on the safe side and get a brand new one. Got 6 months same as cash, on a $188 purchase, so no big bite out of my check.
Thanks fella's for your help and suggestions, be up the creek without it :clap: Will let you know later this week if it ignores Cinavia. I will ignore firmware updates (if possible) or leave it disconnected from the internet if it automatically applies them. Check the firmware rev date and make sure it predates Cinavia requirements.
If gmac1701 is right, and it sounds like he oughtta know, firmware not going to be an issue.
mcm
There you go again. I don't need corrected, I don't need stalked, I don't need arguments. You can't copy a cinavia protected disc to play on a standalone bluray player with clonebd. If you think it can, so be it. Like I said, none of the "cin ex crap" ad nauseum, databases, etc. matters to me one way or another, none of it. It's much ado about nothing and I've moved on.
ImgBurn can copy any blu-ray in the strictest sense of the word, but, without the ability to decrypt the resulting copy, it would end up being just as useless a backup as a Cinavia laden backup on a Cinavia infested player. The ability to copy a disc is irrelevant if it can't be played back correctly. As for CloneBD's ability to remove Cinavia, I suspect we're a bit away from that happening. Having the built in ability to detect it in the stream is a great first step though. What people fail to understand about that is that it demonstrates slysoft's understanding of how the detection algorithm works. If you know how the detector works, you can devise a non destructive method of breaking it.
Originally Posted by mcmenace
There you go again. I don't need corrected, I don't need stalked, I don't need arguments. You can't copy a cinavia protected disc to play on a standalone bluray player with clonebd. If you think it can, so be it. Like I said, none of the "cin ex crap" ad nauseum, databases, etc. matters to me one way or another, none of it. It's much ado about nothing and I've moved on.
Ch3vr0n
Guess you do need correcting, because YES YOU CAN copy a cinavia protected disc to play on a standalone.
Cinavia discs will just trigger cinavia, thats all but you can still copy them
gmac1701; said:100% don't support Cinavia even with the last firmware they produced, that's why they are so pricey especially when you can get a new BD player under £50 in the UK.
My 110's have played back every disk I have thrown at them, even the latest 3D titles, original and backup.
gmac1701 said:Same with the 210, they are selling for £89 ($135) in the UK.
Roycal Good luck with your new/old stock player. It's not likely even a firmware update would install Cinavia unless it is a Sony product. But just to be safe, I would not install any FW updates automatically and only install manually one rev at a time starting with the oldest if absolutely needed to make something work.
As Ch mentioned, most pre-Cinavia players do not even have the signal processor hardware needed to detect Cinavia but it's wise to be cautious.
BTW, FYI, I was informed by slysoft support....
It would then be a job for a copy software to actively find and remove the watermark, but this is not possible at the moment and will not be accomplished by CloneBD, as CloneBD is a "clean" product and will not break any protection or remove any kind of watermark.
Rest assured that we are working hard on finding a solution for this problem. This issue is really nagging us.
So, as you can see, and Ch has seen it, as I've put it here previously, cloneBD will **never** deal with cinavia, leaving anyDVD or an as yet unknown product to deal with it.
Since it is out in the wild now that cloneBD will not deal with cinavia but 'something else' will.
That is contrary to statements SlySoft has said before about CloneBD. Given that it's from SlySoft support, I doubt very much anyone will comment on it publicly, but, it would be good to get clarification on that as it is definitely not what was said before. It was always stated that CloneBD, as some future point, would remove Cinavia once a solution for doing so was found. So that is definitely a bit confusing and contradictory to previous information we've gotten.
That's a shame
So I would suggest we drop the past 'issues' and move on from here.
you won't get me in trouble, if that's what you mean. After all i didn't first post it , and if they didn't ask you to keep that intel private then they can't get you in trouble too either You are right (and it's my guess too) that the implementation of cinavia on DVD's may have been another reason not to use CloneBD. After all that would require additional workload in the software design, make code more complex potentially creating issues, and likely demand a namechange (CloneBDVD?? )? Though spread of it on DVD's is even smaller than on BD's, Sony was and still is pretty much the only user of it.