Just reviewing this topic after some absence from it, rather disappointing there has been no new breakthroughs but not really suprised at the same time.
It looks like a good stockpile of non-cinavia Blu-ray players will be a must, and the cost of a non-cinavia Blu-ray player will be going thru the roof and become liquid gold.
I have stockpiled four non-cinavia players. Come on Slysoft lets get this watermark removed.
I can't honestly see the point in that, if Cinavia is that much a problem then build a single HTPC, problem solved. Thats besides the likely problem of manufacturers abandoning updates for older models.
You have to hand it to the software developers its such a simple solution, rather than a digital encryption which can be cracked what better solution than an analogue audio signal embbeded in the regular audio track. So long as the signal is there the software will detect it, bingo. The only way to remove it is to:
a) build an HTPC with non-Cinavia detecting software on it
b) remove the audio track altogether - not entirely practical (sarcasm)
c) remux an alternative soundtrack that doesn't have Cinavia embedded in - if you have no access to the master audio, again not a practical solution
d) modify the software on the player by "chipping" the BD player with modified software on a chip removing the Cinavia detection routines in the same way my early DVD players had Region Encoding and Macrovision protection systems disabled - thats if it hasn't been made illegal/impossible already (I confess I'm a bit out of the loop on that one)
I favour a) myself. Probably cheaper than d) and you get to choose the software you put on it yourself.
edit: thinking about it even d) is not an option because as soon as the player needs an update that'll be an end of the modified software routines, unless the chip is capable of updating itself over the 'net (seems unlikely)
This wouldn't even be a thought in anyone's mind had DVD HD won the battle. Everyone was concerned about the price if Blu-ray won, not this.
Why do you think Blu-ray won and not HD-DVD? It's precisely
because its a moving platform and HD-DVD was not. It certainly wasn't because of cost or any other inconveniance to the
consumer.