Why the heck did you buy a Blu-Ray player?I own both a Blu-Ray and HD-DVD player. The Blu-Ray picture is dog crap compared to the HD-DVD. I don't understand how anyone can argue superiority on the Blu-Ray side. Anyone that does has never seen both pictures side by side.
I own both a Blu-Ray and HD-DVD player. The Blu-Ray picture is dog crap compared to the HD-DVD. I don't understand how anyone can argue superiority on the Blu-Ray side. Anyone that does has never seen both pictures side by side.
I believe *all* releases from Sony Pictures are MPEG2. No wonder they need 50GB discs. :doh:It was a stupid idea for Sony to stick with mpeg2 for a lot of their BluRay transfers. Just because you have the space to do it doesn't make it the right thing to do. The ones that use the other formats are closer in quality to HD-DVD.
I believe *all* releases from Sony Pictures are MPEG2. No wonder they need 50GB discs. :doh:
I have only seen one single HD DVD where the feature was encoded in MPEG2, and it was not a mainstream title (Chronos).
The other studios do, but I believe Sony Pictures sticks with MPEG2. But I may be wrong, as things change quite rapidly.I thought, and of course I have no experience with this so I am probably wrong here, that they were STARTING to release BluRay discs encoded in the other formats? I'll have to see if I can find where I saw that.
From Wikipedia.Codecs are compression schemes that can be used to store audio and video information on a disc. The BD-ROM specification places requirements on both hardware decoders (players) and the movie-software (content).
For video, ISO MPEG-2, H.264/AVC, and SMPTE VC-1 are player-mandatory. (This means all BD-ROM players must be capable of decoding all three video codecs.) MPEG-2 video allows decoder backward compatibility for DVDs. H.264, sometimes called MPEG-4 part 10, is a more recent video codec. VC-1 is a competing MPEG-4 derivative codec proposed by Microsoft (based on Microsoft's previous work in Windows Media 9). BD-ROM titles with video must store video using one of the three mandatory codecs (multiple codecs on a single title are allowed).
Initial versions of Sony's Blu-ray Disc-authoring software only included support for MPEG-2 video, so the initial Blu-ray Discs were forced to use MPEG-2 rather than the newer codecs, VC-1 and H.264. An upgrade was subsequently released supporting the newer compression methods so the second wave of Blu-ray Disc titles were able to make use of this. The choice of codecs affects disc cost (due to related licensing/royalty payments) as well as program capacity. The two more advanced video codecs can typically achieve twice the video runtime of MPEG-2. When using MPEG-2, quality considerations would limit the publisher to around two hours of high-definition content on a single-layer (25 GB) BD-ROM.
For audio, BD-ROM players are required to support Dolby Digital AC-3, DTS, and linear PCM (up to 7.1 channels). Dolby Digital Plus, and lossless formats Dolby TrueHD and DTS HD are player optional. BD-ROM titles must use one of mandatory audiotracks for the primary soundtrack (linear PCM 5.1, Dolby Digital 5.1 or DTS 5.1.). A secondary audiotrack, if present, may use any of the mandatory or optional codecs.[8] For uncompressed PCM and lossless audio in Dolby TrueHD or DTS-HD Master Audio formats, Blu-ray Discs support encoding in up to 24-bit/192 kHz for up to six channels, or up to eight channels of up to 24-bit/96 kHz encoding.[9] For reference, even new big-budget Hollywood films are mastered in only 24-bit/48 kHz, with 16-bit/48 kHz being common for ordinary films.
For users recording digital television broadcasts, the Blu-ray Disc's baseline datarate of 54 Mbit/s is more than adequate to record high-definition broadcasts. Support for new codecs will evolve as they are encapsulated by broadcasters into their MPEG-2 transport streams, and consumer set-top boxes capable of decoding them are rolled out. For Blu-ray Disc movies the maximum transfer rate is 54 Mbit/s (1.5x) for the combined audio and video payload, of which a maximum of 40 Mbit/s can be dedicated to video data. This compares favorably to the maximum of 36.55 Mbit/s in HD DVD movies for audio and video data.[10]
Initial versions of Sony's Blu-ray Disc-authoring software only included support for MPEG-2 video, so the initial Blu-ray Discs were forced to use MPEG-2 rather than the newer codecs, VC-1 and H.264. An upgrade was subsequently released supporting the newer compression methods so the second wave of Blu-ray Disc titles were able to make use of this. The choice of codecs affects disc cost (due to related licensing/royalty payments) as well as program capacity. The two more advanced video codecs can typically achieve twice the video runtime of MPEG-2. When using MPEG-2, quality considerations would limit the publisher to around two hours of high-definition content on a single-layer (25 GB) BD-ROM.
The other studios do, but I believe Sony Pictures sticks with MPEG2. But I may be wrong, as things change quite rapidly.
EDIT: Sony Pictures. I mean the movie studio. Columbia / TriStar. A Sony Pictures Corporation. Not Sony "Blu-ray".
Uhh, I just posted that.According to the Wikipedia Blu-Ray article:
So it wouldn't surprise me if MPEG-2 compression dissapeared entirely off HD releases in the near future.
According to the Wikipedia Blu-Ray article:
So it wouldn't surprise me if MPEG-2 compression dissapeared entirely off HD releases in the near future.
According to the Wikipedia Blu-Ray article:
So it wouldn't surprise me if MPEG-2 compression dissapeared entirely off HD releases in the near future.
The choice of codecs affects disc cost (due to related licensing/royalty payments)
You're right, VC1 is really awsome. It is used on most HD DVD discs I tried.Ah, ok, I see what you mean. I was pretty sure there were bluray movies out there that weren't mpeg2 based. mpeg2 is probably the WORST idea for HD video. VC1 would be my choice(as much as I hate supporting MS...it is the best as far as I've seen so far).
You're right, VC1 is really awsome. It is used on most HD DVD discs I tried.
Only one studio (the Weinstein Company / Dimension Films) doesn't use VC1 but MP4-H264, and I have to say, it looks very, very good, too.
Lately SamuriHL, they have been on a roll since 1984. Too bad we didn't buy that stock back then. We would all have HD and Blu-Ray entertainment Centers now. LOL.
Sweet, I didn't know that you knew how to program. How geeky are you with computers? No offense.Ok, ok. I'll give you that. I'm a former C++ developer who has switched to Java and gotten away from Windows only development these days, so, I tend to think about MS from that side of things. Maybe I'm a bit jaded. However, I absolutely give them MAJOR props for the Xbox 360 and Live. This is coming from a HUGE Sony Playstation fan...who is now an EX-Sony fan who refuses to get a PS3. But yes, stock would have been nice!! Too bad I was only 11.