Why? Are the providers sharing who is accessing their sites? I doubt it. So having tokens by provider is no more risky that having a single token system and using all those token on one provider.
I didn't mean here.
What and when someone watches what they have downloaded is irrelevant. If they want to download a lot of stuff for their own use what is the problem? Some people download for others in the household and not just themselves. There is the wife/husband, kids, and any other relatives living under the same roof.
Wrong approach. Think about it. For fair use the current system fulfills the needs a person can view per day.
As long as they dont go blind from watching 280 movies or downloads a week.
Its not going to happen.
What happens to those tokens if I don't sign up for those providers, I only want Netflix, in your world, do I lose them?
I am still here on the forum watching the best movie ever " Ground Hog Day" it never ends.
Thank you very much for your kind words. We really appreciate them.
Not really. They can just have the server not return the decryption key to the content until the "consume token" command is sent (after the download finishes). Then the most you can do if you game the system is download tons of encrypted videos, which won't get you very far.That is the happy path. If someone were to hijack the communication at step 3 (after post processing, but before the communication is made) .. *poof* no more download limit.
Because one would have to assume that AS downloads are aborted most frequently due to network outages and/or crashes; not someone hitting 'abort'.
to be 'fair' with a refund the held token approach, they would have to assume any non-communication back was due to this, and 'time out' the hold, otherwise crashed clients wouldn't get a 'refund' anyways.
That wouldn't be hard to game at all.
*shrug*. The more complex a system you make, the harder it is to protect. Simple is better.
280 downloads a week, no good, lets get locked out by the providers and have none.I am still here on the forum watching the best movie ever " Ground Hog Day" it never ends.
Finally, a man who understands. The funnny part about this is, everyone and anybody is here and bought the program, they knew exactly what they were buying, and now they want to complain. 280 movies is not enough. Pleaseeeeeeeeeeeee.
It's sometimes recommended to think about what you got - and reflect about it if it would be gone....
Haven't I been saying that all along?
Its not going to happen.
Good one Steven
and you seem to not understand no matter what you say it's not going to happen. 500 a week, let see there are 24 hours in a day, thats a bit excessive,
It is understood.
and the funny part about it is, its the same 5 or 6 people, all the others are fine with 280 downloads a week, 24 hours in a day, but we give them 40 downloads a day. But still, it's not enough for those few people. smhI am still here on the forum watching the best movie ever " Ground Hog Day" it never ends.
