nero on the fly copy or nero recode - which is best?

Discussion in 'Third Party Products' started by ripdiscuk, May 26, 2007.

  1. ripdiscuk

    ripdiscuk Member

    Dear All

    I'm new to all this ripping of dvd files and wanted a little info:

    Is it best to straight copy disc to disc (on the fly) through nero which is the quickest way to copy a dvd to dvd using that package.

    or alternatively recode the files by using nero again to copy. Does the recode from mpeg2 to mpeg4 make any difference and/or improve the finished movie quality?

    Thanks.
     
  2. MarkRacer

    MarkRacer Well-Known Member

    Copying on the fly will give you the most problems. Always recode to a temporary folder first. Happy backing-up!!!

    :bowdown: :bowdown: WE'RE NOT WORTHY:bowdown: :bowdown:
    SLYSOFT is the SHIZNIT!!!
     
  3. oldjoe

    oldjoe Well-Known Member

    I always copy "on the fly" (3 different PC's) with Recode and I have yet to experience any problems. Maybe I'm just lucky?
     
  4. ripdiscuk

    ripdiscuk Member

    I too have copied on the fly without any problems but does anyone find the quality is improved of movies when recoded thru' nero or does it remain the same?
     
  5. oldjoe

    oldjoe Well-Known Member

    I don't see any difference on my backups.
     
  6. ZO1

    ZO1 Well-Known Member

    Same for me as well, no difference.