Tell us again, cuz I'm stoopid, where EXACTLY it has been established that players exist "that can't ever support this protection"? It seems to me it is only speculation at this point that older BD players cannot be forced to adopt the Cinavia protection with a firmware update.
While I'm doubtful myself about this (that players CAN be "updated" with Cinavia, or even that studios would force manufacturers to do so with an Avatar-type update) until we know for sure, your statement is an assumption. And you do know what it means when you assume something, yes? It's really quite simply...scare-mongering.
It does need to be pointed out that discussing implications of a badly created system and the possibly damaging repercussions in a simple open discussion is not panicking, fear mongering, or FUD. This discussion is essentially theoretical in nature.
I'm not really concerned with this situation right now but myself and others see and recognize the possible shortcomings and pitfalls that may loom on the horizon due to limitations or simple unintended consequences. florinsasu has seemingly confirmed one of the pondered problems with the entire protection mechanism.
This is absolutely correct and my take on the situation, too. This discussion has been really good (and civil which is always appreciated) and educational. Discussing the potential future impact of this particular protection falls under the speculation category. Since only a few titles are soon to be out with it, widespread panic is unwarranted. But, if this becomes common, and some of the things we have discussed do come to pass (forced updates by AACS player key revocation), then it'll become a very annoying situation. The best solution for now is to make sure you have a player, either hardware or software, that isn't affected by this protection and hold on to it. If hardware, and if they do implement key revocation, you'll need to be very careful with what you do with that player. Unfortunately, like I said before, a majority of people won't even be aware of this situation until it's too late. I can easily see a bunch of "hey my backup won't stream/play" posts if this becomes widespread. Speculation isn't always useful, but, in this case we can draw some interesting ideas from what we're already seeing and what we know is possible. And of course, the history of the AACS LA and what they're willing to do. I would say the speculation that's been discussed isn't impossible unfortunately.
And where have I not been civil? I was simply calling-out one of your Moderators on posts which suggest that people buy a player in reaction to the Cinavia situation. There are not yet enough facts in evidence to posit such a suggestion. People have better things to do with their money.Thus far this entire thread has been civil. So, why exactly do you have to cause a problem, DukeOfUrl? Stop with the garbage. Take this as a polite warning.
And where have I not been civil? I was simply calling-out one of your Moderators on posts which suggest that people buy a player in reaction to the Cinavia situation. There are not yet enough facts in evidence to posit such a suggestion. People have better things to do with their money.
@SamuriHL: I've found all of your posts to be informative and helpful, hardly reaching any point where I feel like you're telling any person what to do, but simply providing information based on sources that discuss Cinavia. If nothing else, you're allowing the hardware people (of which I am one) to make a decision based on the information you've provided, which is greatly appreciated, so thanks for that.
And where have I not been civil? I was simply calling-out one of your Moderators on posts which suggest that people buy a player in reaction to the Cinavia situation. There are not yet enough facts in evidence to posit such a suggestion. People have better things to do with their money.
To moderate--"to lessen the intensity or extremeness of"
I don't see that in his posts. Sorry if you think my contributions are "trolling".
OK lets have a vote!!! Who's in favor of banning DUKEOFURL? I been reading this thread since day 1 and no where did anyone say " YOU NEED TO GO OUT AND BUY A NON CINAVIA Blu Ray player"...
@ Humphammer
GOOD to know on your Sony S560, my Sony S560 will be here this afternoon.
What firmware version are you running? 006 or the latest 007?
Or maybe even a older version?
:agree:
were you playing a dvdrip or bdrip? as the dvd isn't protected. Which country is your bluray player from and what firmware version does it have?
Has slysoft managed to get a hold of any Cinivia protected blurays yet? Would be good if they could test several bluray players and make a list of players and firmware versions that do and don't have cinivia.
It was on a Verbatim BD-R 25, and I tried it on my PS3 before purchasing the BDP S 560....it played for 20 minutes on the PS3 before Cinavia kicked in but played from start to finish with zero problems on the S 560....which has 006 firmware.
BTW thanks to SamuriHL for the heads up I got the last S560 that Crutchfield Electronics had....I have also ordered a Sony BDP CX960 400 disc Blu-Ray changer if it is Cinavia free it's just gravy my blu-ray collection is in excess of 400 already just been wating on a price drop.