Ch3vr0n
Translator NL
- Joined
- Sep 27, 2009
- Messages
- 24,312
- Likes
- 3,530
That's not the point. You like trying to prove me wrong but you're not going to succeed again. I suggest you read post 386. That's what triggered the whole illegal issue. The issue never was if you can legally make a backup or not for home use. To make a home use backup you need to OWN THE ORIGINAL. THAT is the issue, if you don't own the original, you're not entitled to make a backup. Period. Post 386 was about ripping a RENTAL DISC without owning the original (if you own the original, that's fine), and that's illegal and piracy. End of story.For personal/private use you don't need a permission. EVER.
...and what's the function of that tax ? Ever thought about that ?
But let's stop this: you're practising selective reading at it's best.
Case dismissed.
Sent from my Nexus 6P with Tapatalk