Midiboy,
I ve send you a PM about reclock
Oh please, share. Reclock in Vista would be very helpful
Midiboy,
I ve send you a PM about reclock
Oh please, share. Reclock in Vista would be very helpful
24p is used only with bluray and hddvd. R1 and R2 standard DVD use the "old" refresh rate 60 & 50 Hz.
24p is used only with bluray and hddvd. R1 and R2 standard DVD use the "old" refresh rate 60 & 50 Hz.
Incorrect.Well mastered NTSC DVDs that are film based were always mastered with 23,976 and §:2 repeat flags for 60Hz, respectively.
There's enormous confusion about whether DVD video is progressive or interlaced. Here's the one true answer: Progressive-source video (such as from film) is usually encoded on DVD as interlaced field pairs that can be reinterleaved by a progressive player to recreate the original progressive video.
Incorrect.
The confusion comes from the fact that progressively flagged NTSC DVDs
Not for pal. Pal DVD are encoded at 25 fps to play in TV that have 50 Hz scan rate. I'm italian and in Italy all DVD can be only play without stutters only at 25, 50 Hz and multiple value. This is the reason why all PAL movie material is "faster" aprox of 4%.With ReClock 24p can be used for NTSC & PAL DVDs as well.
Incorrect.
http://www.dvddemystified.com/dvdfaq.html#1.40
The confusion comes from the fact that progressively flagged NTSC DVDs are handled by most software as being truely progressive while in reality in the background the MPEG2 decoder still decodes interlaced fields which are then combed together by following the flags. So if you ask a software whether a DVD is progressive or not, it will tell you the DVD is progressive, although in the deepest level it's not.
Not for pal. Pal DVD are encoded at 25 fps to play in TV that have 50 Hz scan rate. I'm italian and in Italy all DVD can be only play without stutters only at 25, 50 Hz and multiple value. This is the reason why all PAL movie material is "faster" aprox of 4%.
I'm not really sure for ntsc.
I don't disagree. Unfortunately, there are many discs where the flags are set incorrectly. If you then "blindly" follow the flags you'll get lots of combing. Because of that every good progressive scan DVD player ignores the flags and uses a conventional deinterlacing chip which analyzes the content of the interlaced frames to find out which frames need to be put back together. That's what all those Realta, SiI504, Gennum etc chips are for which you find in Denon, Arcam etc DVD players.I would argue that at the deepest level the DVD is progressive, even though the progressive images are transported via interlaced fields. The fields are marked as part of a progressive image and when correctly reassembled both fields are coincident in time, creating a true progressive image (with no combing effects.)
The fact that the DVD spec requires that the images be carried in the MPEG stream as fields is a technology artifact that does not change the fact that the film went into the encoding process as a stream of progressive images and it leaves a player that reassembles them correctly in the same form.
It s beginning to take too long for news on a new ReClock version if you ask me. I still have some hope that Slysoft is working on a new version but until really confirmed by the makers of Slysoft I m not focussing to much on a re-release of THE all-time HTPC software: R E C L O C K