SamuriHL
UHD Guru
- Joined
- Jan 28, 2007
- Messages
- 15,029
- Likes
- 2,527
Using DL mode depends on the movie. I nearly always compress all my movies to DVD-5 in the end and the savings I get using VobBlanker [see further down in the post where SamuriHL mentions it] aren't worth ripping as a DL to my HDD.
That's an interesting approach. If I know I'm going to do ANY post processing on the movie, I always rip it DL to my external hard drive and then worry about compression as the last step. Still, I see your point about why bother if you can do it in step 1. VobBlanker won't save much if you're just doing logos and stuff, but, occasionally, and more and more, I'm seeing trailers embedded in places CloneDVD can't touch. Yea, it may only be 50-100 megs, but, space is space as far as I'm concerned. Nonetheless, if it's a movie that doesn't require a lot of compression, I'm right there with you on the CloneDVD transcoding process. If it requires more compression I'll opt for either Recode, DVD-RB if it needs a LOT, or DL discs if I have any kicking around. (I don't currently, so, I'm doing DVD-RB on larger discs until I get some more DL discs).
I always do this step, period. It takes all of 5 minutes or so even if it isn't needed but when it is needed it's priceless!
I'm beginning to see the light on this one. FixVTS may not seem necessary to a lot of people, but, trust me, it's not a bad thing to do. Really.
For this step I already know if I will even need because I check the DVD before I've even ripped it. As noted, yes, totally optional and sometimes not even needed. It all depends on who released the DVD.
Yea, I use CloneDVD to preview the movie and titlesets, as well, so I know what I'm up against. Very smart thing to do. For these latest Sony titles, this has become quite necessary unfortunately.
I use CloneDVD 99% of the time and Recode the rest. It depends on the movie. One movie in particular just didn't look right when I compressed with CloneDVD so I used Recode and it definitely looked better.
I use Recode when the compression rate gets to a certain point. Otherwise I just let CloneDVD deal with it. But when I start getting into the 60% range I either opt for DL if have one or I go with an overnight DVD-RB encode using HCEnc. Quality is SUPERB when doing that.
I use Ahead Nero Burning ROM Ultra 7. I use 16x DVD+Rs and burn at 12x with verification turned on. The reason I don't use CloneDVD to burn is the lack of verification when the burn is complete.
Nero's fine. I have it but I dislike it immensely. I use Recode, but, I feel that Nero 6 started a trend that Nero 7 has taken to a whole new level...bloatware. At the moment I only have Recode and Burning Rom itself installed from the 150+ meg installer. What a waste. I'd have stuck with 6 if it was Vista compatible. I was using CopyToDVD for a while but when I went to Vista last year it started flaking out on me. They've recently released a new version that I've installed but haven't played with yet. IMGBurn is working fine for me so I see no reason to change. Oh, and a comment on the verification...I'd turn AnyDVD OFF if you're going to do that. You could run into issues if you don't.
You summed it up perfectly. I just threw in a few comments.
Thank you. I can be taught.
Last edited: