Search results

Cyberlink support know less about their own products than real users I just confirmed that UHD BD HDR (play from folder) works fine at 24 Hz. My desktop was already set at 24 Hz and stayed at 24 Hz while PowerDVD entered UHD BD HDR exclusive mode (PDVD 17 reverts to 60 Hz). I also noticed...

According to this https://forum.redfox.bz/threads/powerdvd-18-launched.74982/#post-487387 24 Hz works now in UHD BD

I read some weeks ago that they added 24 Hz support for UHD BDs Anyone confirmed this?

I also believe that’s the source of the problem Playingback Thor 4K with MPC-BE I noticed minor stuttering during transition from file to file

Haven't tried it But MPC-BE (better over MPC-HC as it outputs correctly HDR metadata) + madVR + NVidia 1xxx is OK

I agree 100% I found my UHD cerfified HTPC to work / not to wrk (UHD playback with PDVD 17) day by day. What a mess this company is... I really miss TMT...

OK, it took them one year to do the obvious (and now asking their clients to pay again)!

Thx I ll check what you said In the meantime, I am checking the drive in another PC After that, I ll check the firmware TeddyRaspin provided

OK, got it. But then: Exactly! Now, regarding my tests: I finished burning with the original firmware and I got no error message in verifying. So it seems that indeed my modded firmware has a problem. I'll try the one provided by TeddySpin and revert. EDIT: And then suddenly...

0x1E0004 is not in the range to be edited, right? So, if there is a difference there, between mine and yours modded firmware, it must come from a difference in the clean firmwares we used. As clean I used the BE16NU50 1.01 found in the link of the 1st post of the thread, right? Which one did...

Thank you very much! I'll give it a try as soon as a finish what already started testing: Reverted to original firmware and trying burning the same rip as before in order to see if I will get again a verify failure. Btw (sorry for asking but I am really trying to understand), what kind of...

@TeddyRaspin Here are the firmwares I used (dump: the original, clean: the one downloaded from the link at the first page of this thread and friendly: the one created by following your procedure / the one currently flashed) If / when you have the time, please take a look and see if something...

I did it and found the following warning / errors around the time of writing / verifying: Warning - BTHUSB - 34 - The local adapter does not support an important Low Energy controller state to support peripheral mode. The minimum required supported state mask is 0x491f7fffff; got 0x1fffffff...

I successfully followed the procedure of @TeddyRaspin and flashed my LG BE16NU50 from 1.02 to 1.01 I did some testing afterwards and I noticed that UHD ripping works OK (I tested one disc which with 1.02 was not recognized at all and with 1.01 was recognized and with AnyDVD can be ripped or...

If I remember correctly, they are the Japan vs EU / Other editions of the same drive

Thx, yes I know I just asked why 1.02 for BE16NU50 is mentioned as clean in the link in the first post of this thread. Maybe this is a mistake that should be corrected

Nope. In case of LG BE16NU50 1.01 is the latest UHD friendly firmware. 1.02 brakes UHD Friendly compatibility https://club.myce.com/t/the-ultimate-ultra-hd-blu-ray-friendly-drive-list-with-recommendation-of-best/399725 - post n.3

@TeddyRaspin I removed the drive from the USB case (BE16NU50) revealing the internal drive (BH16NS50) 2 questions: 1. From the clean firmwares (downloaded from the 1st post of this thread) should I use flash_HL-DT-ST_BD-RE_BE16NU50_1.01 or flash_HL-DT-ST_BD-RE_BH16NS50_1.01 ? 2. I see that...

Yes, I know I asked because I unsterstood that @mgluee did it the right way and failed (and you helped) Anyway, thx again, I ll give it a try

Thx @TeddyRaspin! I ll give it a try Btw, since I am going to follow the same procedure as @mgluee (who failed initially and you helped him), do you know what might went wrong in his case (in order to avoid it and saving you from coming to the rescue)? He mentioned a possible not so “clean”...