I apologize for this post, but the posts I have searched and read so far just don't seem to get to the bonehead level I need.
I understand the difference at some level. Clonedvd is a transcoder, and clonecd is a direct copier.
However, when clonedvd shows 100% quality, I understand that to mean that no additional compression will be done and that the original material will be copied without any loss in quality. Is this true?
If it is necessary to use clonecd to make copies that don't have any loss in quality, is the following process necessary?
- use anydvd to copy the material from the original dvd to hard drive
- use clonecd to make dvd copy from hard drive
or, does anydvd also work with clonecd like it works with clonedvd?
Thanks
Mike
I understand the difference at some level. Clonedvd is a transcoder, and clonecd is a direct copier.
However, when clonedvd shows 100% quality, I understand that to mean that no additional compression will be done and that the original material will be copied without any loss in quality. Is this true?
If it is necessary to use clonecd to make copies that don't have any loss in quality, is the following process necessary?
- use anydvd to copy the material from the original dvd to hard drive
- use clonecd to make dvd copy from hard drive
or, does anydvd also work with clonecd like it works with clonedvd?
Thanks
Mike