This has probably been asked before, but can someone enlighten me. Are you better off ripping a disc with the straight AnyDvd function (Rip to image) or with CloneBD (no compression)? This is for Quality considerations not Time.
I may be WRONG, but it seems to me that you are always better off just creating a complete 1to1 disk image w/protection using AnyDVD HD to hard drive than using Clone BD even with no compression. It seems like that would be the closest to the disk contents being as untouched as possible.
Don't think that's exactly true, but there shouldn't be any (or negligible) difference between an anydvd iso rip and a 'full disc copy' as it's called in CloneBD to an iso. Then again, I can be in the wrong here too but I don't think I am
Maybe @Reto or @Pete can clarify this
Sent from my Pixel 3 XL using Tapatalk