Ok, we know that Shrink can't handle new structural protections correct? But many like Shrink for it's "deep analysis" superior compression quality. Understandable right? But Slysoft can't continue divert resources to be responsible for supporting orphan software that is not updated? Understandable right? AnyDVD's main purpose is to decrypt CSS encryptions and they have no intention of "bloating" it up to include full ripping functions. It is a tiny driver, not a ripping program. The ability to unscramble purposely authored, messed up titleset structural protections is dealing with a different form of protection than CSS decryption. Unscrabbling sturctural protections is the job of the ripping program. But Shrink users have a cult-love for their product and want to keep using their beloved Shrink without being chastized for their desires. All true facts and valid opinions, right?
So both sides accept the issues as they are and use the tools that you
do have at your disposal to get the job done. No more fighting kids!!
I would like to know if everyone is on the same page here. Since Shrink can't rip it and CloneDVD can, have we all tried ripping an ISO Image with CloneDVD2 set to DL +/-R and then used Shrink to process that ISO and compress it to a SL disk?
Now for my (.02) opinion,
why are all you guys compressing? That is
so five years ago! DVD media, both SL and DL is so cheap now, why don't you just split or burn to DL media?
Best regards,
Whisperer